BEGIN
LoopVecorization.jl can be thought of as treating loops like a familiar DSL for specifying dependencies between operations (such as arithmetic and loads or stores) and loops, without regard to any order aside from that inherent in the dependency chains.
The library has infrastructure for modeling the cost of evaluating a loop nest using different orders of the constituent loops, and different unrolling and blocking factors of the loops.
The advantage is demonstrated in allowing writing high performance code that is generic with respect to the data layout of the underlying arrays, with the order of evaluated loops and data access pattern shifting in response to transposed arrays without any change in the user’s code.
END
I think we can format it in better way.
BEGIN
LoopVecorization.jl can be thought of as treating loops like a familiar DSL for specifying dependencies between operations (such as arithmetic and loads or stores) and loops, without regard to any order aside from that inherent in the dependency chains. The library has infrastructure for modeling the cost of evaluating a loop nest using different orders of the constituent loops, and different unrolling and blocking factors of the loops. The advantage is demonstrated in allowing writing high performance code that is generic with respect to the data layout of the underlying arrays, with the order of evaluated loops and data access pattern shifting in response to transposed arrays without any change in the user’s code.
END
Apparently youtube is now using OCR, e.g. on slide titles, to automatically add titles to timestamps. But it probably won’t do that if we have the “help us add timestamps” placeholder timestamps. Not all videos use slides, but for those that do it could be helpful to rely on youtube’s automation.
Thank you for this very valuable information. I didn’t know about that. Badly placed placeholder timestamps generated some problems as you can read here. I think @logankilpatrick and @miguelraz should check this option.
In description we have.
BEGINNING
BLAS & LAPACK are an integral component of many numerical algorithms. Due to their importance, a lot of effort has gone into optimizing ASM/C/Fortran implementations.
Nonetheless, early work demonstrated Julia implementations were often faster than competitors, while laying groundwork for new routines specialized for new problems.
END
I think we can change it to
BEGINNING
BLAS & LAPACK are an integral component of many numerical algorithms. Due to their importance, a lot of effort has gone into optimizing ASM/C/Fortran implementations. Nonetheless, early work demonstrated Julia implementations were often faster than competitors, while laying groundwork for new routines specialized for new problems.
END
We have here slightly different kind of problem. This video is 1:15:44 long, but from what I see first 49:32 is video already available on channel as Gadfly: Native Julia Plotting and Visualization, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsn5SZDkMeI. As such this video should be edited in appropriate way.
JuliaCon 2014 videos titles use different convention that these from recant JuliaCons. This is great that are all available and put in one playlist on YT, but I still believe that we make watching and referencing them better. Below I presented my idea how they should be changed. Of course, anyone can improve my suggestions.
This covers most of the videos from JuliaCon 2014 YT’s playlist. I can miss some and I also excluded Breakout Session — Graphics and Visualization due to problem with it mentioned in previous post.
One more remark about titles. In the titles of the talks you can find sometimes “JuliaCon2021” sometimes “JuliaCon 2021”. Since it seems that it doesn’t matter I will propose to always use more pleasant to eye “JuliaCon 2021”.
In previous post about titles for videos from JuliaCon 2014 I already use this convention.
There is something weird about how this video works on YT. If I add it to playlist or browsing over Julia YT channel, it says that it has length 44:23. But, when you watch it YT says it has length 26:11.
This make no problem for watching it, but it is just weird. Can someone check it?
Huh, that is weird, I see the same behaviour with that video.
For what it’s worth, running youtube-dl --get-duration on that video correctly returns 26:12. And even doing youtube-dl --dump-json on the whole playlist, and extracting out the part about this video, I see "duration" : 1572 (seconds) which is 26:12 in minutes.
It seems that a lot of talks from JuliaCon 2018 have this problem: their length is overstated when you see them on playlist or few other places on YT. I can elaborate on it, but I hope that is not needed here.
I can make a list of videos with this weird problem, but I don’t know how to fix it. Does anyone have some idea?
I start collecting videos from JuliaCon 2018, that have problem with correctly showing time in the playlist and few other places on YT. I split it into the tables, 20 position each.