chobbes
December 14, 2017, 5:43am
1
Searching A_mul_B
in Julia Doc gives me the following results:
Base.A_mul_Bc(Function)
Base.A_mul_Bt(Function)
Base.LinAlg.A_mul_B!(Function)
...
So I wonder why A_mul_Bc
and A_mul_Bt
belong to Base
, while A_mul_B!
lives in Base.LinAlg? Thanks!
mauro3
December 14, 2017, 10:56am
2
I don’t know the reason for that. But there is a big change of these things in 0.7: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/24969
2 Likes
chobbes
December 14, 2017, 12:45pm
3
Thanks for the pointer. I also quickly read the rationale behind this PR, but how are these routines re-grouped and re-affiliated now? Do you by chance know?
A bit surprisingly, it took 3 years for this issue to be addressed. This must be a colossus!
AFAICT the notation is shifted to wrappers, ie the type system. Eg wrapping a matrix in Transpose
now indicates that it should be transposed, etc.
I think that this is a very elegant solution. See the discussion for #4774 for some more history.
chobbes
December 14, 2017, 1:58pm
5
Thanks for the comment. It took me forever to read the almost-endless thread of #4774 .
chobbes
December 14, 2017, 2:06pm
7
Thanks buddy! Watching now. I wish you could have hinted me a hour ago so that I could have lived a slightly easier life in the last hour.
1 Like
chobbes
December 14, 2017, 2:22pm
8
Btw, when will v0.7 be rolled out? I quickly checked the announcement section and saw none relevant.
Or no more releases before v1.0?
mauro3
December 14, 2017, 9:38pm
9
Don’t know. Feature freeze should be tomorrow: 1.0 Feature Freeze Dec 15th
1 Like