The Julia developers are pleased to annouce the release of Julia v1.4.0, the fourth minor release in the 1.x series. Binaries are available for all of your favorite platforms (Linux, macOS, Windows, and FreeBSD) at Download Julia . As a minor release, v1.4.0 contains no breaking changes, only new fe…

[image] Albert_Zevelev: Is there some kind of testing that can be done before a new version of Julia is released to check that, say, the top 20 Julia packages (by github stars) work? And the maintainers can be notified pre-release if there is an issue? [image] Albert_Zevelev: That said, i…

The problem you were experiencing was due to some issue with your local environment, as evidenced by the fact that it was fixed by rm -rf ~/.julia. In general, when people experience an issue with packages, my first advice is always to rm -rf ~/.julia. I know that it seems extreme, but it really do…

[image] dilumaluthge: my first advice is always to rm -rf ~/.julia . I know that it seems extreme Note that this could lead to work lost in packages checked out for development. May not be an issue for new users though. I think that the manual should contain advice about this, cf …

[image] Tamas_Papp: Note that this could lead to work lost in packages checked out for development. That’s a good point. I suppose my advice should actually be: Commit all changes in any packages that you have checked out for development Push all changes to a remote (GitHub, GitLab, etc.) r…

It seems overly drastic to start by removing lots of files and REPL history and what not. My advice if you suspect problem with your depot would be to create an empty directory somewhere and point JULIA_DEPOT_PATH to it. If that works you can start to think about removing stuff in ~/.julia. If it do…

Rather than removing ~/.julia, I would suggest looking at the [compat] section of Project.toml of the two MJL versions alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl/blob/v0.2.3/Project.toml name = "MLJ" uuid = "add582a8-e3ab-11e8-2d5e-e98b27df1bc7" authors = ["Anthony D. Blaom <anthony.blaom@gmail.co…

This might be a case for the developers applying monotonic bounds in RetroCap . Going from 0.10 back to 0.2 is quite a difference, it would probably be more helpful to receive a Pkg incompatibility error.

Sorry to report a glitch on Linux 64 bits with (old) AMD processor (Turion II M640) Invalid instruction at 0x7ff8b4a3f1d0: 0x66, 0x0f, 0x3a, 0x0f, 0xc0, 0x08, 0x0f, 0x83, 0xae, 0x04, 0x00, 0x00, 0x48, 0xc1, 0xe0 signal (4): Illegal instruction in expression starting at none:0 _ZN4llvm13LexicalSco…

Just want to confirm, what LLVM binaries were being used when building those released Julia binaries? It looks like there’re compatibility issues on Windows and Linux: Travis CI https://github.com/JuliaBinaryWrappers/LLVM_jll.jl/issues/3 Edit: I noticed the Julia version on Travis CI is still J…

What can I do to fix issues while keeping most of the useful stuff, like my repl history? For example, should I just back up my repl_history.jl file, and copy it back over after rm -rf ~/.julia? What else should I try to keep? Any suggestions? How do I automatically reinstall all packages after de…

Julia v1.4.0 has been released

Announcements

kdyrhage April 3, 2020, 2:35pm 26

For the record it works just fine for me on Catalina.

Issue with Upgrading to 1.4 on MacOS Catalina

Topic		Replies	Views
Julia v1.0-rc1 is now available Announcements release	60	6945	August 16, 2018
Julia v1.5.0 has been released Announcements release	38	8814	August 15, 2020
Julia v1.6.0-beta1 is now available Announcements release	41	7818	January 27, 2021
List of working packages on v. 1.0 New to Julia	71	7904	September 1, 2018
Julia 1.0.3 testing period Announcements release	37	3829	February 19, 2019

Julia v1.4.0 has been released

Related topics