I’m trying to solve a simple linear system. However, it seems like the preallocated versions of any IterativeSolvers.jl functions are either much slower or allocating more memory. Here’s the example: using IterativeSolvers using LinearMaps function SecondOrderCentralDiffmul!(C, B) C[1] = -2B[…

This is actually not related to IterativeSolvers, but to BenchmarkTools subtleties, mostly because it runs the function several times to get a better estimate of the time. First, as a rule, you should always interpolate global variables when benchmarking. Furthermore, running the mutating version …

IterativeSolvers.jl not working as expected with mutating and allocation

General Usage

leespen1 March 5, 2024, 9:49pm 10

Thanks, I’m working on it now.

Topic		Replies	Views
Unbounded IterativeSolvers.Gmres! different output to MATLAB, slows convergence significantly Performance	13	1862	March 7, 2019
Reduce allocations LinearSolve Performance	4	305	September 22, 2023
Time Dependent Linear Map General Usage package , iterative-solvers	5	216	February 14, 2024
Allocations and time of running the same program twice are orders of magnitude larger than running them separately New to Julia performance , memory-allocation , benchmark	11	657	June 17, 2024
Prevent huge number of allocations mutating columns of arrays Performance	15	543	September 19, 2023

IterativeSolvers.jl not working as expected with mutating and allocation

Related topics