I’m trying to solve a simple linear system. However, it seems like the preallocated versions of any IterativeSolvers.jl functions are either much slower or allocating more memory. Here’s the example: using IterativeSolvers using LinearMaps function SecondOrderCentralDiffmul!(C, B) C[1] = -2B[…

This is actually not related to IterativeSolvers, but to BenchmarkTools subtleties, mostly because it runs the function several times to get a better estimate of the time. First, as a rule, you should always interpolate global variables when benchmarking. Furthermore, running the mutating version …

IterativeSolvers.jl not working as expected with mutating and allocation

General Usage

leespen1 March 5, 2024, 9:49pm 10

Thanks, I’m working on it now.

Topic		Replies	Views
Type Inference Issues in IterativeSolvers with LinearMaps Performance package , packages , profiling , type-stability , cthulhu	2	212	November 9, 2023
Reduce allocations LinearSolve Performance	4	301	September 22, 2023
Using Zygote.jl with IterativeSolvers.jl General Usage zygote , autodiff , iterative-solvers	11	940	February 25, 2024
Issue with using IterativeSolvers, LinearMaps and CuArrays General Usage	6	1138	July 9, 2018
How to distribute the solving of a linear system on multiple Procs? General Usage question , linearalgebra , distributions	0	259	June 7, 2022

IterativeSolvers.jl not working as expected with mutating and allocation

Related topics