Referring to the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.07951.pdf
I see this passage
which means it will run into an infinite loop as the end of block#2 goes back to black #2 with no way to exit.
I think it’s meant to say go back to block #1
Referring to the paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.07951.pdf
I see this passage
which means it will run into an infinite loop as the end of block#2 goes back to black #2 with no way to exit.
I think it’s meant to say go back to block #1
Author replied to me in email and that is wrong as pointed out. There is also a new version of the paper which corrected this mistake