Julia also uses a faster rng algorithm by default (Xoshiro256++), which will probably show up in the differences. Part of the discussion here - Blog: Using Julia on the HPC - is about this difference when comparing to C/C++
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trying to understand low performance compared to C++ | 13 | 443 | October 2, 2024 | |
| A simple Monte Carlo in Julia and C++ | 15 | 6942 | March 15, 2018 | |
| Different speed when estimating pi | 4 | 898 | December 29, 2017 | |
| Quite bad performance of Julia 0.6.4 vs Python+Numpy | 26 | 5429 | November 13, 2018 | |
| Speed up Julia code for simple Monte Carlo Pi estimation (compared to Numba) | 20 | 4224 | August 22, 2021 |