New website

website

#63

Added an issue here:


#64

BTW, in the scientific domain, if you want to mention quantum computing, I don’t think QuantumOptics.jl is accurate. Issued here

And for machine learning, I think Turing.jl should also be mentioned as some kind of Julian’s Stan (a classic lib in other languages).

I can make a PR for those if your guys like.


#65

I can’t say, but this isn’t the first time the term figures prominently in text written by Julians…

               _
   _       _ _(_)_     |  A fresh approach to technical computing
  (_)     | (_) (_)    |  Documentation: https://docs.julialang.org
   _ _   _| |_  __ _   |  Type "?" for help, "]?" for Pkg help.
  | | | | | | |/ _` |  |
  | | |_| | | | (_| |  |  Version 0.7.0 (2018-08-08 06:46 UTC)
 _/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_|  |  Official http://julialang.org/ release
|__/                   |  x86_64-w64-mingw32

#66

Hi

I like the site overall, but in the Julia Observer list, I’m missing the test status that was available in the old site’s package listing.
Frequently when I’m looking for a package related to a topic, I searched the list for keywords and then looked at the very short description and the test status.
While it doesn’t tell you how much is really tested, it does give a sense that if the package fails tests in the last 2 versions and the date was a year ago that the package is probably stale and abandoned. This was atleast a warning to use with caution and/or maybe search a bit more if there isn’t a more active and recent substitute even if they used slightly different wording in their descriptions.

Especially with all the breaking changes switching from 0.6 to 0.7 and later, I’m missing a proper feedback on when I can attempt switching my work code to 0.7. Currently the package listing page seems to indicate I should probably still wait with only 20% working.
All of the datestamped changes to package test status also only seem to be on the left 0.6 column, no changes on the 0.7 column…?


#67

Hi, I realized the version in Spanish has several typos and grammatical mistakes. Is there a way I can help with that? I am native speaker.


#68

The version of what in Spanish? You just need to make a Pull Request to the relevant file.


#69

I guess you are talking about the 1.0 blog post. In that case you can edit with your corrections following this link: