Added an issue here:
https://github.com/JuliaQuantum/JuliaQuantum.github.io/issues/47
BTW, in the scientific domain, if you want to mention quantum computing, I donāt think QuantumOptics.jl is accurate. Issued here
https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/issues/105
And for machine learning, I think Turing.jl should also be mentioned as some kind of Julianās Stan (a classic lib in other languages).
I can make a PR for those if your guys like.
I canāt say, but this isnāt the first time the term figures prominently in text written by Juliansā¦
_
_ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to technical computing
(_) | (_) (_) | Documentation: https://docs.julialang.org
_ _ _| |_ __ _ | Type "?" for help, "]?" for Pkg help.
| | | | | | |/ _` | |
| | |_| | | | (_| | | Version 0.7.0 (2018-08-08 06:46 UTC)
_/ |\__'_|_|_|\__'_| | Official http://julialang.org/ release
|__/ | x86_64-w64-mingw32
2 Likes
Hi
I like the site overall, but in the Julia Observer list, Iām missing the test status that was available in the old siteās package listing.
Frequently when Iām looking for a package related to a topic, I searched the list for keywords and then looked at the very short description and the test status.
While it doesnāt tell you how much is really tested, it does give a sense that if the package fails tests in the last 2 versions and the date was a year ago that the package is probably stale and abandoned. This was atleast a warning to use with caution and/or maybe search a bit more if there isnāt a more active and recent substitute even if they used slightly different wording in their descriptions.
Especially with all the breaking changes switching from 0.6 to 0.7 and later, Iām missing a proper feedback on when I can attempt switching my work code to 0.7. Currently the package listing page seems to indicate I should probably still wait with only 20% working.
All of the datestamped changes to package test status also only seem to be on the left 0.6 column, no changes on the 0.7 columnā¦?
1 Like
Hi, I realized the version in Spanish has several typos and grammatical mistakes. Is there a way I can help with that? I am native speaker.
2 Likes
The version of what in Spanish? You just need to make a Pull Request to the relevant file.
2 Likes
I guess you are talking about the 1.0 blog post. In that case you can edit with your corrections following this link:
2 Likes
I have the impression that the Julia examples from the old website are gone. Is that correct? Thatās a pity, if I show Julia to new people they want to see a piece of code to understand if it is easy to read.
3 Likes
And now the website is only be displayed in mobile styleā¦ I think that is a bugā¦ (I hope).
I donāt know what āmobile styleā is, but the website works fine for me on a desktop.
Can confirm that it looks good both in my laptop (normal wide screen) and mobile phone (vertical layout).
Yes, it dynamically reflows the layout several different ways depending upon your window width. Perhaps try making your window wider?
Iāve noticed, however, a strange behavior on mobile for which I opened an issue: https://github.com/JuliaLang/www.julialang.org/issues/409
Can anyone reproduce?
I can reproduce on iOS 12.4, Safari, Firefox and Chrome.
Iām pretty sure the problem is the width of the iframe that contains the Juliacon videos. Hereās a 20 second clip that uses the cool mobile browser emulation feature in desktop Chrome (ātoggle device toolbarā) and Firefox (āresponsive design modeā) to demonstrate the issue:
Sorry that itās so blurry. I wanted to test imgurās new video clip capability but apparently their reencoding is really aggressive.
EDIT: I reposted this to the Github issue opened by @lostella.
3 Likes
Looks nice. Would it be possible to add the respective probabilistic programming languages (Turing, Soss, Gen) to the Machine Learning and the Data Science ecosystems?
They seem to be missing at the moment.
1 Like
Please make a PR to add them. The website code is here:
2 Likes