I’m using LoopVectorization to speed up some function to great effect. However, I’m finding the syntax it allows to be quite limiting. I’m loping over a sparse matrix like this to gather an energy function. It works great and is fast, but the syntax is very ugly. Moreover, I would like to hold the s…

Loop Vectorization syntax very limiting

f.ij October 25, 2023, 6:09pm 5

I’ve seen you are working on LoopModels, it looks awesome, and thanks for all the effort.

1 Like

Macro that inlines functions

Topic		Replies	Views
LoopVectorization for sparse matrix operation : @turbo, LoopVectorization.check_args Performance question	1	377	March 3, 2023
Broadcast vs. scalar loop, can Julia vectorize better? Internals & Design	8	1923	February 15, 2020
LoopVectorization does not support functions with kwargs? Performance loopvectorization	9	1247	October 12, 2021
[ANN] LoopVectorization Package Announcements	157	23312	May 27, 2020
Why is this small `@inline` function much slower than an equivalent macro? Performance performance , macros , simd , inline	2	902	June 26, 2021