Yes, I can answer it:
julia> x = rand(10^6);
julia> bx = [v < 0.5 for v in x];
julia> ix = findall(!, bx);
julia> @benchmark z[bx] setup=(z=copy(x)) evals=1
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 745 samples with 1 evaluation.
Range (min … max): 4.486 ms … 28.198 ms ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 81.56%
Time (median): 4.569 ms ┊ GC (median): 0.00%
Time (mean ± σ): 4.939 ms ± 2.251 ms ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 4.37% ± 8.00%
█▇▄▄▃▂▁▂▁▁
██████████▇▇▇█▇▇▆▅▆▆▁▅▅▅▆▇▆▆▄▇▅▅▇▆▄▁▄▁▁▁▄▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▄▁▁▁▁▁▁▄ ▇
4.49 ms Histogram: log(frequency) by time 7.24 ms <
Memory estimate: 3.82 MiB, allocs estimate: 2.
julia> @benchmark z[ix] setup=(z=copy(x)) evals=1
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 1398 samples with 1 evaluation.
Range (min … max): 1.287 ms … 29.172 ms ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 94.65%
Time (median): 1.355 ms ┊ GC (median): 0.00%
Time (mean ± σ): 1.699 ms ± 2.259 ms ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 12.15% ± 8.70%
██▅▄▂▁▁ ▁
███████▇▇█▇▆▄▇▅▄▄▄▄▄▁▄▄▄▄▄▆█▇▇▇▆▄▄▄▄▅▆▅▄▄▁▁▄▄▄▁▁▄▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▄ █
1.29 ms Histogram: log(frequency) by time 4.27 ms <
Memory estimate: 3.81 MiB, allocs estimate: 2.
julia> @benchmark deleteat!(z, bx) setup=(z=copy(x)) evals=1
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 1764 samples with 1 evaluation.
Range (min … max): 798.600 μs … 3.617 ms ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00%
Time (median): 825.700 μs ┊ GC (median): 0.00%
Time (mean ± σ): 927.020 μs ± 304.150 μs ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00%
██▄▂▂▂▁ ▁
██████████▇▇▇▆▅▅▅▇▅▃▃▅▅▇▁▄▅▃▁▄▁▃▁▃▁▁▁▁▄▃▁▁▁▁▁▃▃▁▄██▇▇▇▆▁▄▁▄▃▅ █
799 μs Histogram: log(frequency) by time 2.22 ms <
Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0.
julia> @benchmark deleteat!(z, ix) setup=(z=copy(x)) evals=1
BenchmarkTools.Trial: 859 samples with 1 evaluation.
Range (min … max): 3.794 ms … 6.477 ms ┊ GC (min … max): 0.00% … 0.00%
Time (median): 3.828 ms ┊ GC (median): 0.00%
Time (mean ± σ): 3.976 ms ± 316.706 μs ┊ GC (mean ± σ): 0.00% ± 0.00%
█▆▂▂▂▁▃▁ ▁
████████████▇██▇▆▅▆▇▅▅▇▆▇▄▅▆▅▆▅▆▆▅▁▅▄▄▅▅▄▅▅▄▄▆▅▁▅▄▁▅▅▅▅▁▁▁▅ ▇
3.79 ms Histogram: log(frequency) by time 5.21 ms <
Memory estimate: 0 bytes, allocs estimate: 0.
And the current code in DataFrames.jl assumed that deleteat! and getindex had the same relationship in performance. Which clearly it has not. I will make a PR to fix it.