i greatly appreciate that! i am not sure if JulIDE can or will become as big as Juno or the VSCode extension, but that dosent mean i wont try
i am not sure how that works, but glad to hear!
also, if you have any features you want to see in JulIDE, i am open to suggestions, and even if i dont accept them, we have a plugin registry now
I admire how your projects spark engagement in the community. Mine haven’t found that rhythm yet, but your work is a reminder of the impact thoughtful contributions can have.
my reasoning for building JulIDE is not to be better than Juno or VSCode, its to be a decent option for Julia developers for their IDE
not sure this is relaistic, but ill try to achieve that
first of all, thank you for the star! it helps a ton
about the improvements you suggested
A: that is on purpose because of how the JulIDE security model works, but i should make a toggle to enable external images
B: even with ```Julia?
C: could you explain further about this? like in the editor or in markdown?
D: ill happily add that
thank you very much for the suggestions!
the images in markdown fix is already in github and will be released along with JulIDE 0.5.0
as for the rest, they may have to wait until 0.6.0 or even 0.7.0 since my backlog is pretty full, which is a good thing in my opinion, but at the end of the day i am a solo maintainer xD
ill try adding a backround to the logo, i hope that will fix it, but not sure since my art skills are horrible (the logo was made by a friend of mine xD)
Update: JulIDE 0.5.0 is out! this release introduces the ability to use jupyter notebooks in plain .jl files via the Jupytext format, dev containers are now fixed to work on windows, and are now the recommended way to work with Linux tooling from windows. fatou on windows has been fixed as well
(note: i was in a bit of a rush for this release due to the fatou bug, so if you encounter anything abnormal, let me know!)
Suggestion, don’t use characters like these
use plain ASCII !==
Personally, I find them very disturbing to read, but surely this is only one opinion (make them optional?)