Performance comparisons are always problematic, because they are always far more complicated than they appear. To be meaningful, such comparisons must be ultra specific, which this is not. That said, I would agree that the statement about Fortran is probably misleading. Furthermore that paragraph strikes me as “business-speak” (also known to Neal Stephenson fans as “bullshit”) and all “business-speak” should be ignored. To be fair, it doesn’t appear to be coming from the Julia devs, and they are probably in a difficult position, as “business-speak” is usually a requisite for advertising to business people.
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Keeping scientific objectivity and details in benchmark reports | 56 | 4726 | June 28, 2021 | |
[ANN] New benchmark comparison | 5 | 1027 | March 13, 2018 | |
Julia vs Fortran speed | 5 | 1856 | October 13, 2021 | |
I just decided to migrate from Python+Fortran to Julia as Julia was faster in my test | 37 | 7075 | June 25, 2021 | |
Julia 3 times slower than Fortran reading integer data from ASCII file | 14 | 1226 | March 26, 2022 |