Julia as a neural interpreter? Could this be a game-change for Julia and ML/AI?

I’ve sometimes posted ML stuff I find intriguing to offtopic. This seems relevant enough to post here.

@ChrisRackauckas claims Julia doesn’t have an advantage for “standard” ML (unlike SciML). This may not be “standard” but if I understand if correctly, and this is the future of ML (replacing Transformers), or something in this direction, then I think the BLAS argument may be going away:

See here interview (I’m not yet there, I’m at this timepoint, that I think may be of interest to others):