out <- glm(y ~ . , family=binomial(),data=turnout) In R, above syntax works and i expected that’s similar to julia, but . is not a proper symbol in GLM.jl maybe. julia> out = glm(@formula(y ~ .), train, Binomial()) ERROR: syntax: invalid identifier name "."

Yes, still the best way. Well, the way it’s written is awkward. julia> term(:y) ~ sum(term.(names(df, Not(:y)))) FormulaTerm Response: y(unknown) Predictors: x1(unknown) x2(unknown)

How to use all variable in @formula like R language?

New to Julia

nilshg September 30, 2022, 10:40am 2

dup of

Topic		Replies	Views
Using all independent variables with @formula in a multiple linear model New to Julia glm	18	4503	January 29, 2023
Using all variables on a regression? General Usage	0	493	November 20, 2018
Creation of R formula with interpolated Julia Symbol (RCall) Statistics question	1	889	February 23, 2017
How to get a GLM where formula is programmatically generated New to Julia dataframes , glm	3	1325	September 1, 2020
Formula creation without direct name specification Statistics question	2	1583	January 12, 2017

How to use all variable in @formula like R language?

Related topics