Even using the in-place method `rand!`

to sample from a `MvNormal`

distribution seems to allocate some memory and be orders of magnitude slower than the univariate case. I only have a two dimensional case, so I was hoping to find a way to optimize but can’t seem to find out how.

Suggestions?

There is no obvious reason to me that this should be allocating.
Here is the code for reference if anyone wants to go digging

```
```
function _rand!(rng::AbstractRNG, d::MvNormal, x::VecOrMat)
unwhiten!(d.Σ, randn!(rng, x))
x .+= d.μ
return x
end
# Workaround: randn! only works for Array, but not generally for AbstractArray
function _rand!(rng::AbstractRNG, d::MvNormal, x::AbstractVector)
for i in eachindex(x)
@inbounds x[i] = randn(rng, eltype(x))
end
unwhiten!(d.Σ, x)
x .+= d.μ
return x
end

```
```
function unwhiten!(r::AbstractVecOrMat, a::AbstractMatrix, x::AbstractVecOrMat)
v = _rcopy!(r, x)
lmul!(chol_lower(cholesky(a)), v)
end

`cholesky`

on a `PDMat`

should be nonallocating as it does that upfront during construction

A simple example:

```
using BenchmarkTools, Distributions, Random
using Random: rand!
X = MvNormal([2 1; 1 3])
y = zeros(2)
rng = Xoshiro()
@btime rand!($rng, $X, $y);
```

which produces

```
133.021 ns (2 allocations: 96 bytes)
```

It seems to matter that the distribution is a `ZeroMeanFullNormal`

but I’m not sure why.

markmbaum:

```
using BenchmarkTools, Distributions, Random
using Random: rand!
X = MvNormal([2 1; 1 3])
y = zeros(2)
rng = Xoshiro()
@btime rand!($rng, $X, $y);
```

There seem to be two sources of allocations. The first is `PDMats.chol_lower`

called here . Not certain why this allocates; maybe because the result is a typeunion? This allocation is 16 bytes.

The second is this line , where the mean `μ`

is added to the result via broadcast. The mean in this case is a `FillArrays.Zeros`

, and it seems that `broadcasted`

makes a copy:FillArrays.jl/fillbroadcast.jl at c3b38add861d475aadc66a112e045d7e0db31372 · JuliaArrays/FillArrays.jl · GitHub . This results in an 80 byte allocation. Seems like this could be improved in FillArrays.

1 Like