OK, this provides the number of digits in the given base.
I was more thinking about the actual amount of memory used. But I realize now that this is probably a bad question since Julia uses GMP for BigInts and GMP has its own nontrivial memory management and allocates memory outside the control of Julia.
So your answer provides a lower bound and, assuming that the overhead is not that big, a good estimator for the actual memory consumption.
I really think that summarysize should be taught about this so that it reports the memory used by BigInts accurately. Same deal with BigFloats too. Anyone want to file an issue or open a PR?