That’s only half true. It wouldn’t surprise me at all if Julia moves more in the direction of other JIT languages, and run on very low optimization levels for non-performance sensitive code. Getting this right would be hard, but it very well might be easier than getting fast compile times. My guess is in a year or two, Julia will probably be much better at both interpreting code, and having statically compiled code. Packages will largely be precompiled, and non-critical code will be interpreted. This is just wild speculation by a mostly outside observer though, so take it with a heavy grain of salt.
Oscar_Smith
18
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 'using Plots' takes 20 seconds or more | 30 | 10838 | November 27, 2020 | |
| How to choose a plotting package? | 54 | 16957 | June 9, 2017 | |
| Roadmap for a faster time-to-first-plot? | 250 | 35514 | August 3, 2021 | |
| State of Plotting Packages as of 2018/12/15 | 39 | 5229 | June 10, 2019 | |
| Where is actual development in Plotting? | 161 | 15357 | November 21, 2017 |