Is there a way to check if a NamedTuple has a field :a that is elided by the compiler? For example, let t=(a=1, b=2). Then the fact that t has fields :a,:b is known at compile time (because this info is in the type of t): julia> typeof(t) NamedTuple{(:a, :b),Tuple{Int64,Int64}} However both haskey…

[image] e3c6: This seems like a compiler bug? Should someone raise an issue? It is not a bug. But there is an issue open about it Constant propagation for tuple in operator only works for first element · Issue #28844 · JuliaLang/julia · GitHub . Also, the problem is not only with in but with p…

Zero-cost way to check if `NamedTuple` has a field?

General Usage

carstenbauer May 28, 2019, 10:23am 3

Topic		Replies	Views
Is the first key of a NamedTuple special? General Usage	3	524	February 27, 2019
Slowness of fieldnames and propertynames Internals & Design	5	1111	March 10, 2021
Type inference when generating a NamedTuple General Usage question	3	471	October 14, 2018
<: union shorthand in NamedTuple type Internals & Design question	2	551	July 5, 2018
Function that constructs NamedTuple with function argument field names, and correctly infer return type General Usage metaprogramming , inference	5	1279	October 29, 2018

Zero-cost way to check if `NamedTuple` has a field?

Related topics