Hi, I wanted to ask if there more optimal way w.r.t to Performance to find the inverse of a matrix than inv() from Linear Algebra package

You might have a look at the discussion here: [image] Why re-use factorization(A) rather than inv(A) Numerics What is the advantage of first decomposing and then left dividing every time over inverting once and multiplying the inverse every time?

Alternatives to inv() in Julia

Specific Domains Numerics

JM_Beckers July 2, 2024, 11:25am 2

You might have a look at the discussion here:

5 Likes

Topic		Replies	Views
Why re-use factorization(A) rather than inv(A) Numerics performance , linearalgebra	7	534	September 30, 2024
Can I avoid inverting a matrix? General Usage question , linearalgebra	4	358	October 16, 2023
Too much matrix inverse error? New to Julia linearalgebra , matrices	3	1093	November 4, 2021
Avoiding computing inverse of matrix, don't think it's possible in my case Performance linearalgebra , linearsolve	4	421	May 8, 2023
Should `inv` be lazy? Internals & Design linearalgebra , base , lazy-evaluation	24	1963	July 23, 2020

Alternatives to inv() in Julia

Related topics