Hi, I wanted to ask if there more optimal way w.r.t to Performance to find the inverse of a matrix than inv() from Linear Algebra package

You might have a look at the discussion here: [image] Why re-use factorization(A) rather than inv(A) Numerics What is the advantage of first decomposing and then left dividing every time over inverting once and multiplying the inverse every time?

Alternatives to inv() in Julia

Specific Domains Numerics

JM_Beckers July 2, 2024, 11:25am 2

You might have a look at the discussion here:

5 Likes

Topic		Replies	Views
LinearAlgebra.inv! not exported, in-place inversion Performance linearalgebra	5	273	February 1, 2024
Why re-use factorization(A) rather than inv(A) Numerics performance , linearalgebra	7	594	September 30, 2024
CUDA Matrix inverse GPU cuda , linearalgebra	13	6210	December 7, 2021
LinearAlgebra.inv matrix inversion slower than MATLAB? Performance performance	21	2149	October 25, 2021
Should `inv` be lazy? Internals & Design linearalgebra , base , lazy-evaluation	24	2022	July 23, 2020

Alternatives to inv() in Julia

Related topics