just to note that it is an “automerge guideline”, not a rule of the General registry. The difference being you only need to follow it for your updates to be automatically accepted but they can still be manually accepted if the rule is not followed. So it’s not saying “this is how you must do it”, but rather “this is the most uncontroversial way to do it and so qualifies for merging without any further discussion”.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questions on the versioning semantics of Julia packages | 5 | 742 | February 8, 2024 | |
| Does bumping a dependency's compat lower bound require a breaking release? | 4 | 550 | September 14, 2023 | |
| Dependency constraints in packages | 0 | 417 | October 1, 2018 | |
| Versioning in a new Julia package | 3 | 592 | January 6, 2022 | |
| PSA: If your package's version is of the form `0.y.z`, please do NOT bump the minor version for new features | 1 | 2624 | April 1, 2021 |