I just observed the following on v1.4 (so apologies if it is gone on v1.5). julia> x = [ rand(0:9, 2) for a = 1:3 ] 3-element Array{Array{Int64,1},1}: [3, 8] [2, 4] [3, 1] julia> x[1,1] 2-element Array{Int64,1}: 3 8 julia> x[1] 2-element Array{Int64,1}: 3 8 Why does x[1,1] work at all, an…

There is a short note at the end of this chapter: https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/arrays/#Omitted-and-extra-indices You can in your example do: julia> x[1,1,1,1,1] 2-element Array{Int64,1}: 7 3

Why is the following behaviour not a bug?

General Usage

Tamas_Papp October 28, 2020, 5:39pm 14

I don’t know where the threshold will be between revising minor warts (which not everyone considers warts, BTW) and keeping compatibility, but I suspect it will lean toward the latter. Cf

1 Like

Topic		Replies	Views
Vector{Vector} indices General Usage indexing , arrays	22	2432	September 19, 2022
Why x[[1,2]] = [0,0] works? General Usage question	2	621	December 13, 2018
Indexing 1-Dimentional Arrays General Usage question , array , type	4	2970	November 3, 2019
Apparently `getindex` of a vector accepts more than one index?! General Usage indexing , array , arrays	1	181	April 21, 2024
Question about indexing into an array of arrays New to Julia	1	275	January 30, 2020

Why is the following behaviour not a bug?

Related topics