Revise complains that there's an error watching manifest while updating packages

General Usage
1

While trying to update packages, I encountered this error today:

(..) pkg> add https://github.com/JuliaLinearAlgebra/MKL.jl#vs/lp64
    Updating git-repo `https://github.com/JuliaLinearAlgebra/MKL.jl`
    Updating registry at `~/.julia/registries/General.toml`
   Resolving package versions...
   Installed FFTW ─────────────── v1.1.1
   Installed FastTransforms_jll ─ v0.5.4+0
   Installed AbstractFFTs ─────── v0.5.0
   Installed Folds ────────────── v0.2.7
   Installed Transducers ──────── v0.4.71
   Installed ThreadedScans ────── v0.1.0
   Installed BangBang ─────────── v0.3.35
   Installed FastTransforms ───── v0.12.6
  Downloaded artifact: FastTransforms
    Updating ┌ Error: Error watching manifest
│   exception =
│    SystemError: opening file "/home/jishnu/.julia/packages/BangBang/38u2D/src/NoBang/NoBang.jl__@require__": No such file or directory
│    Stacktrace:
│     [1] systemerror(p::String, errno::Int32; extrainfo::Nothing)
│       @ Base ./error.jl:174
│     [2] #systemerror#68
│       @ ./error.jl:173 [inlined]
│     [3] systemerror
│       @ ./error.jl:173 [inlined]
│     [4] open(fname::String; lock::Bool, read::Nothing, write::Nothing, create::Nothing, truncate::Nothing, append::Nothing)
│       @ Base ./iostream.jl:293
│     [5] open
│       @ ./iostream.jl:282 [inlined]
│     [6] open(f::Base.var"#364#365"{String}, args::String; kwargs::Base.Pairs{Symbol, Union{}, Tuple{}, NamedTuple{(), Tuple{}}})
│       @ Base ./io.jl:328
│     [7] open
│       @ ./io.jl:328 [inlined]
│     [8] read
│       @ ./io.jl:436 [inlined]
│     [9] (::Revise.var"#42#43"{String})()
│       @ Revise ~/.julia/packages/Revise/ePDRj/src/pkgs.jl:450
└ @ Revise ~/.julia/packages/Revise/ePDRj/src/pkgs.jl:477

I’m unsure about what caused this, and if this is an issue with Revise. Has anyone else encountered this? It’s worth noting that I had loaded my own package previously in the session, and most of these dependencies would already have been loaded.

2

It’s not too much help, but this has been separately reported to Revise.jl. It’s unfortunately still outstanding, but figured I’d link the breadcrumbs here: