Just to be extra clear, again: I’m not seeing any issues with the Tachikoma.jl package from which this discussion spun off. You definitely seem to have sufficient experience to use the agent-workflow effectively. So: more power to you!
There’s absolutely no issue with LLM-assisted coding. It’s great when it can make people more productive, and I also agree that when used correctly, it has great potential to improve the quality of packages. For Tachikoma in particular, that seems to be the case.
What we’re trying to protect against at the ecosystem level is huge quantities of low-effort code swamping the registry.