I am trying to use pkg> dev --local
for a package available locally, but it seems that --local
is ignored and no copy in dev
is made. Is this expected behavior or a known issue?
dev --local
works for registered packages of course.
I can replicate the issue in master
and 1.5.2.
Iād expect this behaviour.
I did this awhile back with
dev "path_name"
or
dev --local "path_name"
or something like that. Sorry for the lack of precision, but it was a few months ago.
I think it should just be clarified in the docstring that --local
only works when you give a package as an argument, and not a path (similar to https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/pull/2037/files).
3 Likes
Thanks, I will make a small PR for the docs.
Is there a rationale for this, or just not implemented yet?