Consider the following code doing a simple computation: function test_vectorized(a, a_old) @. a[:] = a_old[:] * 2 end function test_vectorized2(a, a_old) @. a = a_old * 2 end function test_devectorized(a, a_old) nx = size(a, 1) @inbounds @simd for i = 1:nx a[i] = a_old[i…

@views function test_vectorized3(a, a_old) @. a[:] = a_old[:] * 2 end julia> @time test_vectorized3(a2, a); 0.126813 seconds (5 allocations: 208 bytes) I think views will also work for your stencils.

Performance drop for explicit indexing in fused loops

General Usage

dpsanders June 26, 2017, 1:38pm 5

Don’t benchmark in global scope.

CSV Reading (rewrite in C?)

Topic		Replies	Views
Comprehensions and vectorization New to Julia	13	4909	September 20, 2017
How to optimize computation within vectorized list operation and large array? Performance	16	462	October 21, 2022
Large performance regression of vectorized functions on master General Usage	4	614	July 25, 2018
Unexpected poor FOR loops performance Performance question	8	358	June 28, 2025
Performance difference between two code New to Julia	3	782	January 18, 2017

Performance drop for explicit indexing in fused loops

Related topics