Pattern matching for macros

[Evey]

@ExpandingMan

Sorry, I did not mean to try to derail the thread. It seems to me that if you had good pattern matching on blocks, it would obviate the need for a special macro syntax on blocks, which was why I brought it up.

I think it’s a good suggestion, but I would strongly prefer having good pattern matching available to case-by-case special syntax.

No worries! I think good pattern matching is important too, but I see no reason why this suggestion (which is a change to the parser) would in any way negatively influence the adoption of MacroTools or a similar package.