I do know that SemVer isn’t a strongly enforced standard, let alone the only one for versioning. Informal interpretations would have even less of a consensus, not more. Again, nothing I said implied your preferred interpretation of SemVer to be non-compliant with SemVer, in fact it’d be quite nice if it were mandated in the standard.
“Semver concerns API stability, not production-readiness” does apply to all those packages. Again, it does not imply “these packages are not production-ready…or even usable…” To spell it out, the set of packages with stable APIs contains reliable or production-ready packages. Nothing in the SemVer standard or this thread denied so; you were arguing against a position of your own invention. Respectfully, that’s the last comment I’ll contribute to this particular subthread, whether you accept it is up to you.