Hello A very basic question. This used to work without fuss: A=rand(10) log(A) But with Julia 1.1 it is not valid any more: MethodError: no method matching log(::Array{Float64,1}) Closest candidates are: log(!Matched::Float16) at math.jl:1018 log(!Matched::Complex{Float16}) at math.jl:1019 …

Use log.(A). Also, please quote your code: PSA: how to quote code with backticks .

[image] ramonz: But with Julia 1.1 it is not valid any more: If you are upgrading old code, upgrade it to earlier Julia versions first so that you will see the deprecation messages. (log(array) was deprecated in Julia 0.6.) (For example, if you have code that was written for Julia 0.5, fir…

I also recommend this blog post for the rational between this change: More Dots: Syntactic Loop Fusion in Julia More Dots: Syntactic Loop Fusion in Julia | After a lengthy design process (https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8450) and preliminary foundations in Julia 0.5 (/blog/20…

Logarithm of an array

New to Julia

mbauman Split this topic April 11, 2019, 3:14pm 6

5 posts were split to a new topic: Performance of log.(x)

Topic		Replies	Views
How to do `logspace()` in Julia v. 1.0.x? New to Julia	5	12889	October 20, 2021
Performance of logarithm calculation (when not to use the dot operator?) Performance	3	1251	April 24, 2018
Performance of log.(x) General Usage performance , broadcast	11	2776	April 12, 2019
Sum of logs Performance	19	1162	May 10, 2022
Deprecated Syntax - ignore General Usage question	2	507	October 11, 2018

Logarithm of an array

Related topics