Julia could’ve been better than MATLAB, even in heavily vectorized code, if some of the great projects like ParallelAccelerator.jl were still active. It seems that the countless changes that Julia witnessed recently drove many people away.

I don’t understand that. Julia is much better at vectorized code than before, due to the introduction and improvement of dot-broadcasting. My impression was that things like ParallelAccelerator became obsolete, because the language development either incorporated or overtook this development. The n…

Most of ParallelAccelerator is now part of Base Julia (threading) and standard compiler optimizations. I am not sure what’s missing.

[image] ChrisRackauckas: I am not sure what’s missing. Maybe just this: How do I deprecate a package?

Julia vs Matlab side thread

General Usage

Tero_Frondelius August 30, 2018, 10:46am 4

Maybe just this: How do I deprecate a package?

2 Likes

Topic		Replies	Views
Is Intel’s ParallelAccelerator.jl still maintained? Community question , package , parallel	18	3489	January 3, 2019
Status of and need for ParallelAccelerator General Usage	2	1066	October 31, 2019
ParallelAccelerator.jl vs Devectorize.jl vs other General Usage question	7	1272	July 14, 2017
How does the future of ParallelAccelerator look like? Julia at Scale question	3	715	September 27, 2018
Blog: Using Julia on the HPC Teaching & Outreach blog-post	40	2497	October 10, 2022

Julia vs Matlab side thread

Related topics