Julia programs (currently just those from BaseBenchmarks.jl ) are now shown on the benchmarks game website. Everyone is welcome to contribute improved programs to the project, following these instructions — [image] CONTRIBUTING.md · master · The Computer Language Benchmarks Game /... W…

Well, you should just then translate the Chapel code to Julia: you will get a better program!

Since you have the data, any chance you could make a list/table of each Julia program sorted by gzipped length relative to the shortest program for each benchmark?

Of course, I’m just not quite sure what you are asking for exactly? 10 tables, one for each benchmark, only Julia programs (but all of them), sorted by factor of gzipped length vs. shortes length? If you prefer, I can also clean up my messy script and provide that. Edit: here we go, the script to …

[image] non-Jedi: Ha! You caught me. In my defense, I did make an attempt to understand the algo from the paper linked in the benchmark description, but I didn’t have time (or inclination honestly) to learn enough Haskell to interpret the paper. I’m way out of my depth in this conversation in…

The Julia version on the website got updated to 1.3 . Unless I managed to gaslight myself, this made the benchmarks run a bit faster: [Toy benchmark program busy seconds compared to the fastest for selected programming language implementations.] Julia is now listed ahead of Java, which is an impres…

A few months back I run some of the C and Julia benchmarks on my laptop. Excluding compilation time, Julia was much faster than what shown on the website and typically on par with C. I wonder what would happen to your plot if you removed compilation time, i.e. running code twice, after a first “warm…

Including jit warmup time is an intentional design decision of the benchmark game. It hurts languages like Java as well. Many of the tasks are compute-intensive enough that Julia’s compilation time doesn’t matter much, but not all are. Julia’s high rank including compilation I think testifies strong…

If that’s the case they should include compilation time for the AOT languages.

There’s some sense in their approach in that with the AOT languages you can just compile a binary once and run it multiple times and even distribute it. For Julia, JIT compilation has to happen again every time you quit and restart julia. However, perhaps this means that there’s room for us to pull…

Julia programs now shown on benchmarks game website

Community

anon56330260 December 3, 2019, 2:36pm 144

I wonder why “Dart aot” is much slower than Dart in some cases(the difference is really huge in regex-redux)…What happens here?

Topic		Replies	Views
Benchmark game challenge and some optimization questions Performance	29	3100	January 13, 2024
Benchmarks game Performance	20	4127	May 13, 2020
Julia needs work at "Benchmark Game": numbers seem off up to 100x slower, maybe "Julia AOT" entries needed? Community	10	1942	November 23, 2018
Help with binary trees benchmark games example General Usage benchmarks	53	4200	May 6, 2021
Funny Benchmark with Julia (no longer) at the bottom Performance benchmark	149	7474	November 4, 2023

Julia programs now shown on benchmarks game website

Related topics