Hi,
I need to find at least one more suitable reviewer for the JOSS submission entitled:
ABCdeZ.jl: Simulation-based Bayesian inference and model evidence estimation in Julia
Here is the submission URL:
opened 01:02PM - 18 May 26 UTC
pre-review
TeX
Julia
Track: 5 (DSAIS)
**Submitting author:** @mauricelanghinrichs (<a href="http://orcid.org/0000-0001… -8529-5749">Maurice Langhinrichs</a>)
**Repository:** https://github.com/mauricelanghinrichs/ABCdeZ.jl
**Branch with paper.md** (empty if default branch): paper
**Version:** v0.6.0
**Editor:** @jbytecode
**Reviewers:** @rafaelorozco
**Managing EiC:** Chris Vernon
## Status
[](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acaffaf92bfa5453f31632c116bbc545)
Status badge code:
```
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acaffaf92bfa5453f31632c116bbc545"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acaffaf92bfa5453f31632c116bbc545/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acaffaf92bfa5453f31632c116bbc545)
```
**Author instructions**
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mauricelanghinrichs. **Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned** to your paper.
@mauricelanghinrichs if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search [the list of people](https://reviewers.joss.theoj.org/lookup) that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
**Editor instructions**
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
```
@editorialbot commands
```
Please ping me if you want to be a reviewer.
Thank you!
I have also submitted my Julia code work for Athena++ simulation data plotting in JOSS. But reviewer rejected it saying that script is too small. It took me 6 months to develop this algorithm but still they rejected. I got this algorithm after many failed routes. See how difficult it was: