The macro Threads.@threads parallelizes for loops. Is there something similar for list comprehension and map? I can trivially rewrite them as for loops, but prefer not to.

How to parallelize list comprehension and map with multithreading?

Skoffer July 2, 2021, 10:22am 21

Only benchmark can tell.

Topic		Replies	Views
Using @threads in [f(x) for x in 1:max_X] New to Julia	5	414	June 27, 2023
More threads, slower code, even if not spawning them Performance	19	926	January 29, 2022
ThreadsX mapreduce performance Performance multithreading	12	1273	October 18, 2021
Trying to use map function in Threads General Usage question , multithreading , distributed	6	962	September 1, 2022
Pmap, Folds.map and ThreadsX.map perform worse than map for a seemly parallel task Performance question , package , parallel	10	882	November 15, 2021