The following example attempts to define A on several workers, which then update their local copies. How can I make this work? using Distributed,Test addprocs(2) @everywhere function incA() A += myid() # this is the local copy of A println("worker:",myid(),", A=$A") A end @everywhere …

I think you are having scoping issues. When you execute @everywhere initA(), the function is executed on all workers: it defines A within the local scope and when it returns, A is lost. The line @test @fetchfrom 2 A .== fill(3.0,3) fails because it’s looking for a variable A at the global scope on…

How to get persistence on distributed workers

General Usage Performance

mkarikom January 14, 2021, 11:11pm 8

Very clear, thank you!

Topic		Replies	Views
Confusing julia behavior. @everywhere macro changes the scope of local variables to global General Usage parallel , distributed , scope	5	1242	March 6, 2022
Error running distributed code inside of a module General Usage	6	765	January 31, 2021
Basic of `@everywhere` and `@distributed` macro New to Julia question	5	1471	June 23, 2023
Distributed code loading inside modules General Usage question , parallel , module , distributed	8	1201	July 15, 2021
Using local module with @everywhere Julia at Scale distributed	2	939	September 12, 2022

How to get persistence on distributed workers

Related topics