This is an MWE simplified from some code that tries to implement * for a type and AbstractStrings. In this MWE, the intention is to return a Foo whenever any argument is a Foo. Is this a bug, or user error? I think that the * method should be more specific than the *(s1::Union{AbstractChar, Abstra…

Like you said, Base doesn’t have a *(::AbstractString, ::AbstractString...) method. Replace that 3rd method and you find: julia> f(s1::Union{AbstractChar, AbstractString}, ss::Union{AbstractChar, AbstractString}...) = 0 f (generic function with 3 methods) julia> f("h", "i") ERROR: MethodError: f(:…

Fatal: error thrown and no exception handler available for a * method

General Usage

oheil August 28, 2023, 8:09am 2

Topic		Replies	Views
Please stop using `error` and `ErrorException` in packages (and Base) General Usage error	29	6377	May 2, 2019
Best practices for error trapping and exception handling in Julia as of mid 2022 General Usage question	4	492	October 15, 2022
Type inference for return types? New to Julia	5	527	February 18, 2022
Is there a better way to do error handling on Julia than try/catch? General Usage	19	9825	March 15, 2019
Why is throw(Exception) less efficient than throw(String) when unreachable? New to Julia performance	7	1086	March 23, 2017

Fatal: error thrown and no exception handler available for a * method

Related topics