Hi
I am back to BioJulia and I see that the main indexed site appears to be https://biojulia.dev. Alas, that appears… old (2024). OTOH, there is a BioJulia Unified Docs which appears to be up to date.
What gives?
All the best
MA
Hi
I am back to BioJulia and I see that the main indexed site appears to be https://biojulia.dev. Alas, that appears… old (2024). OTOH, there is a BioJulia Unified Docs which appears to be up to date.
What gives?
All the best
MA
In-progress updates that stalled due to the primary author of the update getting busy with school. Busy primary Org maintainers (me, @jakobnissen).
Help is appreciated if anyone wants to make a push - I’m better at reviewing PRs even when I don’t have time than I am at initiating then.
So, biojulia.dev is the official BioJulia website. The unified docs are a work-in-progress site that is meant as a central resource for people to get an overview of which packages are in the BioJulia ecosytem. Perhaps the two webpages ought to be unified.
In general, BioJulia is composed of a handful of people who use Julia as part of their work, and spend some time writing open source code. Very little time is spent doing ‘admin’ work, such as setting up the website. When, once in a while, someone decides to put their free time work into updating the website, such as @M-PERSIC or @kevbonham did recently, their donate time is the only labor being spent on it, and if they leave any work unfinished, the result will be exactly as unfinished as they left it. There is no extra pool of work we can distribute strategically to finish it up.