I’m a biologist that got into programming through R and statistics. I’ve tried Python too, but not as extensively, and I’m not, by any means a coder or programmer o package developer. That said, I’ve found Julia more intuitive than R or Python, especially when trying to understand the code. I’m sure my lack of experience in the field doesn’t give me a lot of perspective, but when I started to go deeper into packages in R, not much made sense, I’ll run into C code and things way above my pay grade. I didn’t find that at Julia, even though I admit I still don’t completely understand how different developers accomplish some things. That’s my experience and that’s why I’ve been trying to learn Julia and preaching a little bit about it. Luckily, I don’t need to “unlearn” years of Python, something I’m sure it’s hard to achieve.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What Python Creator Guido van Rossum Thinks of Rust, Go, Julia, and TypeScript | 88 | 11867 | June 8, 2021 | |
| Julia motivation: why weren't Numpy, Scipy, Numba, good enough? | 123 | 84200 | September 21, 2018 | |
| Julia from the perspective of a pythonista | 122 | 7323 | February 26, 2021 | |
| How is Julia Like Python? | 38 | 3849 | April 9, 2020 | |
| Resources for evangelism | 15 | 1840 | September 23, 2020 |