The main thing that causes me to not use the `\circ`

operator in julia as much as i do the mathematica equivalent (they use `@`

) is, that I need to wrap everything in parantheses.

I can see that this relates nicely to mathematical notation but what is the most common usecase for me, is that i wrote a function call like `sqrt(-2)`

and then i notice “ahh… I need an `abs`

there”.

If i were to just insert a `\circ abs`

between `sqrt`

and `(`

, that would go easily, but putting additional parantheses before `sqrt`

and after `abs`

killing the gain.

Long story short: couldn’t `sqrt \circ abs(-2)`

be parsed or lowered as `(sqrt \circ abs)(-2)`

? That would also make it more similar to its brother `|>`

.

# \circ and parantheses

**DNF**#5

`abs(-2)`

could return a function?

I don’t see `\circ`

as that useful for cases like these, where `sqrt(abs(-2))`

is at least as good. It’s nice for creating anonymous functions, though. `sqrt ∘ abs`

is much better than `x->sqrt(abs(x))`

.

Why would that be breaking? The current syntax would be still valid just not mandatory.

**Tamas_Papp**#9

@DNF already suggested this, but let me elaborate: the current behavior is useful for working with higher order functions. The docstring for `∘`

mentions

```
julia> map(uppercase∘first, ["apple", "banana", "carrot"])
3-element Array{Char,1}:
'A'
'B'
'C'
```

and one can find other examples in the standard library, eg in `Pkg`

```
for (name, uuids) in sort!(collect(unresolved), by=lowercase ∘ first)
```

It is emphatically not for `(f∘g)(x)`

, for that `f(g(x))`

is much more readable. The same applies to `!`

for functions, eg `!f`

is fine but `!f(x)`

is preferred to `(!f)(x)`

.

@BeastyBlacksmith: whenever you are wondering about a design choice or a use case for something in Julia, it is good practice to look at usage in `Base`

and the standard library. Not everything is perfect, but many things are the result of a conscious decision and form a coherent whole.