Are the Symbolics.jl docs outdated?

I’m relatively new to Julia and have been having some trouble following the docs for Symbolics.jl ; not sure if I am misunderstanding something.

(I am looking at the “stable” version of Symbolics.jl docs, in the “variables” section of the Manual; I couldn’t include a link in the post. Though this question also applies to the ? help docs in the REPL since the docs there look identical.)

Examples:
[TermInterface.iscall]
the “examples” section for iscall returns “false” on all their examples when I run them - if I apply Symbolics.value(…) or Symbolics.unwrap(…) to the arg, I can reproduce the intended returns. Is this from an outdated version of Symbolics or something else?

[TermInterface.arguments]
Likewise, the Examples section on arguments doesn’t work for me - I see “MethodError: no method matching arguments(::Num)”; and likewise, if I wrap the args in Symbolics.value(…), they work.

Am I missing something here, or are possibly some of these docs outdated? Any suggestions to a newcomer trying to become acquainted with Symbolics but a little disconcerted with some of the docs examples (or advice on when to trust docs etc)? Thanks!

@cryptic.ax looks like we missed a spot.

all docs have something outdated. Just open an issue if you find something.

Yeah that docstring is wrong. Even Symbolics v6 didn’t support iscall on Num. The docstring is in SymbolicUtils and should use @syms.