But note that Python’s and is && in Julia, so you already have that.
There is nothing “logical” in calling that operator and as opposed to &&. Various languages have different conventions, you cannot derive this from first principles. At least not spelling them out is consistent (cf 1 + 1 vs 1 plus 1).
We would, if we were using another programming language that uses these operators. Again, you appeal to “logic”, but these are (arbitrary) syntactic decisions.
In any case, this is unlikely to change now (unless, of course, we all go Zen).