Just be clear, this particular comment was referring to the sequential loops written with @floop
, not the parallel loops. See the BlockVector
speedup w.r.t iterate
in [RFC/ANN] FLoops.jl: fast generic for loops (foldl for humans™) (Note: back then there was no parallel @floop
). You can also manually write nested loop quite easily in this case anyway and you don’t need it to be generic over collection type. So probably I shouldn’t have shoehorned FLoops advertisement
1 Like