I’m trying to get a small piece of code that I’ll run millions of times to run without allocations. There is a small allocation that I cannot understand the cause of (for example, using Profile.Allocs cannot attribute the allocation to anything, even with a sample rate of 100%), but that I can avoid…

[image] user664303: struct Transform{T<:Number} rot::SMatrix{3, 3, T} trans::SVector{3, T} end The problem is that SMatrix{3, 3, T} is not concrete, since it is missing its fourth parameter L which is the total length of the array. Replace it with SMatrix{3, 3, T, 9} and the issue sho…

Adding parameters to function definition avoids allocations

General Usage Performance

user664303 November 9, 2022, 3:43pm 4

I’ve now created a working MWE and posted it here.

Topic		Replies	Views
Spurious memory allocations within function Performance question , memory-allocation	9	436	March 22, 2023
Parametric types and StaticArrays Performance	2	378	December 8, 2023
Remove allocations from splatting? General Usage question , memory-allocation	18	572	July 19, 2023
Understanding allocations General Usage	2	397	October 6, 2018
Impact of specifying input types on function performance, when referencing arguments from Vector{Any} Performance	16	606	November 10, 2022

Adding parameters to function definition avoids allocations

Related topics