Add reduction `none()` as syntactic sugar in place of `!any()`

Internals & Design
1

none() would work as follows:

none([false, false, true, false]) => false
none([false, false, false, false]) => true
2

!any is the same length as none and already works…

3

IMHO none would be much more clear when reading code… but I agree we can also live with !any.

5 Likes
4

Agreed – it’d give use the full set: any, all, and finally none.

1 Like
5

Easy fix where you want to use it:

const none = !any
4 Likes