# \#policy

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/tag/policy/639.md

[Latest](https://discourse.julialang.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discourse.julialang.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://discourse.julialang.org/tags.md)

---

## [Non-native English speakers and the use of language assistance](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/non-native-english-speakers-and-the-use-of-language-assistance/137194)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@gwr](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/gwr)\
**Replies:** 42\
**Last updated:** [May 21, 2026, 4:19pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/non-native-english-speakers-and-the-use-of-language-assistance/137194 "2026-05-21T16:19:32Z")

</div>

I would like to raise a broader community question about fair participation for non-native English speakers in technical/policy discussions. Today, I made a policy proposal on JuliaRegistries/General on Github that took…

---

## [POLICY: feedback discussion splitting](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policy-feedback-discussion-splitting/57362)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@StefanKarpinski](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/StefanKarpinski)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [March 17, 2021, 7:02am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policy-feedback-discussion-splitting/57362 "2021-03-17T07:02:50Z")

</div>

We’re introducing a “feedback discussion splitting” policy on this forum. What this means is that while it’s totally ok for people to leave feedback on a broad set of subjects in a single message, rather than continuing …