# \#codecov

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/tag/codecov/144.md

[Latest](https://discourse.julialang.org/latest.md) · [Categories](https://discourse.julialang.org/categories.md) · [Tags](https://discourse.julialang.org/tags.md)

---

## [Codecoverage button not working any longer](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecoverage-button-not-working-any-longer/129876)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@ufechner7](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/ufechner7)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [June 16, 2025, 4:02pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecoverage-button-not-working-any-longer/129876 "2025-06-16T16:02:49Z")

</div>

On all of my repositories the button for code coverage is broken. Example: KiteModels.jl The link itself is still working, just the image is missing. Anybody else with this problem?

---

## [Exclude parsing of \`public\` statements in Julia v1.10 CI](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/exclude-parsing-of-public-statements-in-julia-v1-10-ci/126998)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@nandoconde](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/nandoconde)\
**Replies:** 8\
**Last updated:** [March 16, 2025, 11:19pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/exclude-parsing-of-public-statements-in-julia-v1-10-ci/126998 "2025-03-16T23:19:01Z")

</div>

Hi! I am in the latest steps of setting up my repo for publishing and I am now setting up CI. My repo has some symbols declared as public for v1.11+ releases, but I want to keep compatibility in LTS (since there is no a…

---

## [Codecov missing coverage of myfunction(::SomeType) = 1](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecov-missing-coverage-of-myfunction-sometype-1/122796)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@JeffFessler](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/JeffFessler)\
**Replies:** 5\
**Last updated:** [December 9, 2024, 1:59am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecov-missing-coverage-of-myfunction-sometype-1/122796 "2024-12-09T01:59:18Z")

</div>

I have some packages that previously had 100% code coverage but now the badges are showing \<100% coverage because codecov is falsely claiming that some lines that look like myfunction(::SomeType) = 1 are not being cove…

---

## [Codecov.io and using packages not in the general registry](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecov-io-and-using-packages-not-in-the-general-registry/118488)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Gus\_Hart](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Gus_Hart)\
**Replies:** 1\
**Last updated:** [August 23, 2024, 6:40am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecov-io-and-using-packages-not-in-the-general-registry/118488 "2024-08-23T06:40:18Z")

</div>

I’ve created a package that uses another package which is not in the general registry. When the CI/coverage testing runs (github action) it fails, saying it expects the included package to be found in the general registr…

---

## [PSA: new version of codecov-action requires additional setup](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-new-version-of-codecov-action-requires-additional-setup/109857)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@gdalle](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/gdalle)\
**Replies:** 12\
**Last updated:** [February 8, 2024, 7:55am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-new-version-of-codecov-action-requires-additional-setup/109857 "2024-02-08T07:55:06Z")

</div>

What’s going on Codecov is a very useful tool to assess code coverage, that is, how much of the package source code is hit by the test suite. In GitHub continuous integration workflows, this happens through the codecov-a…

---

## [Aggregate coverage from multiple GH actions jobs](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/aggregate-coverage-from-multiple-gh-actions-jobs/107490)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@baggepinnen](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/baggepinnen)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [December 12, 2023, 4:47pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/aggregate-coverage-from-multiple-gh-actions-jobs/107490 "2023-12-12T16:47:08Z")

</div>

I have a repo which contains a main package and a sub package located in /lib, for which I run CI in parallel using multiple GH-actions jobs (groups). This generally works well, except that it’s tricky to get coverage re…

---

## [Code Coverage Unknown for Private Repo](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/code-coverage-unknown-for-private-repo/101315)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@JohnS](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/JohnS)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [July 7, 2023, 1:23pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/code-coverage-unknown-for-private-repo/101315 "2023-07-07T13:23:33Z")

</div>

Thanks for your help; please let me know how I can be clearer etc. I generated a pkg using the PkgTemplates “A More Complicated Example”. Pushed the repo to GitHub; CI is passing. Clicked the code cov unknown badge. Th…

---

## [Approach for using codecov with subpackages](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/approach-for-using-codecov-with-subpackages/95438)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@beorostica](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/beorostica)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [March 6, 2023, 5:12pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/approach-for-using-codecov-with-subpackages/95438 "2023-03-06T17:12:09Z")

</div>

I want to know how to use codecov when there are subpackages in a github repo. Initially, I was working in a repo with codecov configured in the CI workflow and everything worked as expected. However, once we started to…

---

## [CodeCov doesn't see @recipe macro](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecov-doesnt-see-recipe-macro/94433)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@jared711](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jared711)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [February 10, 2023, 8:44pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/codecov-doesnt-see-recipe-macro/94433 "2023-02-10T20:44:13Z")

</div>

I’ve been trying to get my code coverage to 100% in my package ThreeBodyProblem.jl\[GitHub - jared711/ThreeBodyProblem.jl: An astrodynamics package for working in the three body problem\] The last thing left that isn’t co…

---

## [Getting the Github all checks pass green mark even if CodeCov decreased](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/getting-the-github-all-checks-pass-green-mark-even-if-codecov-decreased/74264)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@e3c6](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/e3c6)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [January 10, 2022, 3:34pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/getting-the-github-all-checks-pass-green-mark-even-if-codecov-decreased/74264 "2022-01-10T15:34:00Z")

</div>

Is there a way to not make CodeCov decreases result in this red cross that Github displays? See figure for an example. All tests pass, documentation builds fine, but CodeCov coverage decreased by a few percent and now yo…

---

## [Best way to Continuous Integration and Automated Tests](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/best-way-to-continuous-integration-and-automated-tests/67838)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@tiago](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/tiago)\
**Replies:** 6\
**Last updated:** [September 20, 2021, 9:04am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/best-way-to-continuous-integration-and-automated-tests/67838 "2021-09-20T09:04:58Z")

</div>

Hi, I have a package called NeuralFieldEq.jl and I’m having some troubles regarding the continuous integration and test automation. When I deployed the package I used Coveralls and Travis. However, when the v0.1.1 of t…

---

## [Generating HTML Code Coverage in Azure DevOps](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/generating-html-code-coverage-in-azure-devops/57870)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@Michal](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/Michal)\
**Replies:** 0\
**Last updated:** [March 24, 2021, 2:16pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/generating-html-code-coverage-in-azure-devops/57870 "2021-03-24T14:16:11Z")

</div>

How can I generate HTML Code Coverage Report for my git repository in AZURE DevOps? Is it possible with some kind of plugin?

---

## [GitHub actions CI using CodeCov code coverage](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/github-actions-ci-using-codecov-code-coverage/50487)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@jhbdiehl](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jhbdiehl)\
**Replies:** 2\
**Last updated:** [November 20, 2020, 12:49pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/github-actions-ci-using-codecov-code-coverage/50487 "2020-11-20T12:49:21Z")

</div>

I am currently trying to shift my Julia CI from Travis to GitHub actions (and am pretty new to the topic of CI). Any working workflow for implementing codecov.io usage for GitHub actions in a julia project is highly appr…

---

## [Is there a problem with codecov and -nightly?](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-a-problem-with-codecov-and-nightly/5517)

<div class="topic-metadata">

**Author:** [@anon94023334](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/anon94023334)\
**Replies:** 3\
**Last updated:** [August 23, 2017, 1:43am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/is-there-a-problem-with-codecov-and-nightly/5517 "2017-08-23T01:43:32Z")

</div>

So, nightly is in LightGraphs’ “allowed failures” list, and it’s been failing. We just fixed the last deprecation in LG so that nightly works (a single line change), and our code coverage dropped ~30%: https://codecov.io…