# Would it be a good idea to list academic papers using Julia on the Julia-lang website?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005
**Category:** Community
**Created:** [March 16, 2025, 10:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005 "2025-03-16T10:45:51Z")
**Posts on this page:** 7
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![xiaoxi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/a9adbd/32.png) [@xiaoxi](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/xiaoxi)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2025, 10:45am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/1 "2025-03-16T10:45:51Z")

</div>

As more and more academic papers use Julia, I wonder if it would be a good idea to list them on the Julia-lang website, similar to the list of books that use Julia. It would bring a bit more recognition to authors within this community and help grow the idea that Julia is also useful for academic publishing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![thofma](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/thofma/32/1691_2.png) [@thofma](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/thofma)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2025, 11:14am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/2 "2025-03-16T11:14:57Z")

</div>

You mean, one should create a list with 7000+ entries including those from [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.de/scholar?cites=12373977815425691465&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=de)?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![xiaoxi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/a9adbd/32.png) [@xiaoxi](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/xiaoxi)
#### Post date: [March 16, 2025, 1:15pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/3 "2025-03-16T13:15:59Z")

</div>

Thank you for your response. You have just confirmed my suspicions. I was afraid that the list was too long to be effective.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kapple](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/kapple/32/218915_2.png) [@kapple](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/kapple)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2025, 7:56am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/4 "2025-03-17T07:56:25Z")

</div>

Well I guess it’s a good thing that there’s lots of papers using Julia. Not a bad question.

Would be more powerful to list large influencing entities that use and/or contribute to Julia, which we already do 😊.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![greatpet](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e495f1/32.png) [@greatpet](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/greatpet)
#### Post date: [March 17, 2025, 9:22am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/5 "2025-03-17T09:22:32Z")

</div>

> [@thofma](#):
>
> You mean, one should create a list with 7000+ entries including those from [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.de/scholar?cites=12373977815425691465&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5&hl=de)?

Good point, though not all of them are papers “using Julia” rather than “acknowledging Julia”. Some of these papers include:

- [Array programming with NumPy](https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2649-2)
- [Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library](https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/bdbca288fee7f92f2bfa9f7012727740-Abstract.html)

Combined together, the large number of papers does mean that Julia is highly regarded as either a tool to use or a novel idea to build on.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![xiaoxi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/x/a9adbd/32.png) [@xiaoxi](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/xiaoxi)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2025, 5:56am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/6 "2025-03-18T05:56:49Z")

</div>

If it is too difficult to distinguish all papers that use Julia from those that acknowledge it, I wonder if an alternative might be to promote new papers that use Julia in the monthly newsletter. If the newsletter had a section for this, authors could include their paper information in the newsletter.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![narawat](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/narawat/32/30988_2.png) [@narawat](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/narawat)
#### Post date: [March 18, 2025, 10:19am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/would-it-be-a-good-idea-to-list-academic-papers-using-julia-on-the-julia-lang-website/127005/7 "2025-03-18T10:19:24Z")

</div>

What about if we build a vector database out of those papers so users can chat with it?
