# Will Julia ever fix its "using ..." latency problems?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/will-julia-ever-fix-its-using-latency-problems/50659>\
**Category:** Performance\
**Created:** [November 23, 2020, 11:57pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/will-julia-ever-fix-its-using-latency-problems/50659 "2020-11-23T23:57:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 42

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FedericoStra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/76d3ee/32.png) [@FedericoStra](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/FedericoStra)\
**Post date:** [November 24, 2020, 6:50pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/will-julia-ever-fix-its-using-latency-problems/50659/42 "2020-11-24T18:50:33Z")

</div>

This may be viable when working with scripts (it is still ugly, and the history in the REPL becomes a useless mess), but it’s definitely not an option while developing modules. I’m mostly concerned with that. I find that working on modules is very tiresome because of the constant restartings required. And testing incurs the loading penalty every time too. To be completely honest, my workflow seems to me slower than with a compiled language such as Rust.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/will-julia-ever-fix-its-using-latency-problems/50659)._
