# Why was Kaimon.jl no longer available?

**URL:** https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-was-kaimon-jl-no-longer-available/138629
**Category:** Offtopic
**Created:** [August 5, 2026, 6:40pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-was-kaimon-jl-no-longer-available/138629 "2026-08-05T18:40:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![goerz](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/goerz/32/3269_2.png) [@goerz](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/goerz)
#### Post date: [August 5, 2026, 9:16pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-was-kaimon-jl-no-longer-available/138629/15 "2026-08-05T21:16:17Z")

</div>

> [@\[ANN\] Kaimon.jl — opening the gate between AI agents and Julia](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-kaimon-jl-opening-the-gate-between-ai-agents-and-julia/135880/115):
>
> > [@goerz](#):
> >
> > it’s not okay to push low-effort LLM content onto others
> 
> If you are not including Kahli’s packages in that statement

No, I’m explicitly not including Kahli’s packages in that statement! The packages are 100% fine, see also [Policies around registering AI-created packages in General? - #175 by goerz](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/policies-around-registering-ai-created-packages-in-general/136228/175) where I had to repeatedly make the point about there being no problem with Kaimon and related packages being registered.

Update: I edited the original comment. That was not very well written on my part, since (as you picked up on), it implied that Kahli was pushing low-quality LLM content, which isn’t the case (and never has been). Let me try again:

> [@goerz](#):
>
> it’s not okay to harass people who use LLMs, as much as it’s not okay to escalate in response to such harassment.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-was-kaimon-jl-no-longer-available/138629)._