Why not an even-harder scope?

I noticed that @A_Dent kept saying “closure capture the value”, but just to make sure, closures captures variables, not the objects, right (the docs seem to say so)? If they captured objects, it doesn’t seem like you even need scopes and new variables each iteration to avoid the repeated value bug, you could just inline the integers into the function.
Now that I think of it, why don’t closures capture values instead of variables?

2 Likes