# Why is juliaup emphasized as the installation mechanism?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-juliaup-emphasized-as-the-installation-mechanism/134844>\
**Category:** Tooling\
**Created:** [January 2, 2026, 4:49pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-juliaup-emphasized-as-the-installation-mechanism/134844 "2026-01-02T16:49:50Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 32

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GeorgeGkountouras](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/77aa72/32.png) [@GeorgeGkountouras](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/GeorgeGkountouras)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2026, 5:18pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-juliaup-emphasized-as-the-installation-mechanism/134844/32 "2026-01-05T17:18:54Z")

</div>

> [@aplavin](#):
>
> The reason `rustup` can be “the” way to install Rust, but `juliaup` shouldn’t be “the” way to install Julia is simple – only developers need to install Rust, but Julia needs to be installed by users as well.

If you want to treat your users as non-devs, [perhaps Jumbo.jl could help](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/ann-jumbo-a-scientific-julia-distribution/133856)?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-juliaup-emphasized-as-the-installation-mechanism/134844)._
