# Why is it reliable to use open source packages for research?

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-it-reliable-to-use-open-source-packages-for-research/113823>\
**Category:** Offtopic\
**Tags:** package\
**Created:** [May 4, 2024, 3:49am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-it-reliable-to-use-open-source-packages-for-research/113823 "2024-05-04T03:49:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 48

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tecosaur](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/tecosaur/32/23206_2.png) [@tecosaur](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/tecosaur)\
**Post date:** [May 12, 2024, 2:00am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-it-reliable-to-use-open-source-packages-for-research/113823/48 "2024-05-12T02:00:45Z")

</div>

It would also be good if tools like Supposition.jl could be more widely adopted and so help avoid “oops, we tested a special case where the bug doesn’t occur” cases.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/why-is-it-reliable-to-use-open-source-packages-for-research/113823)._
