# Where is juliac developed

**URL:** <https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004>\
**Category:** Internals & Design\
**Tags:** question\
**Created:** [April 16, 2024, 11:27am UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004 "2024-04-16T11:27:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jbytecode](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/julialang/user_avatar/discourse.julialang.org/jbytecode/32/17719_2.png) [@jbytecode](https://discourse.julialang.org/u/jbytecode)\
**Post date:** [September 30, 2024, 12:30pm UTC](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004/9 "2024-09-30T12:30:16Z")

</div>

just reminding:

> [@PackageCompiler bundled libraries](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/packagecompiler-bundled-libraries/119168/6):
>
> The legendary pull request of producing smaller binary executables has been merged to master today. The classical hello world program is about 1.5 mbs and takes nearly 30 msecs to run, whereas a numerical integration of normal distribution (extensive loops) is 1.7mbs and takes nearly 40 msecs. I prepared a thread about this on fosstodon, this thread is about my first tries. The generated output is currently depended on two Julia dynamic libraries. I think the next step will be producing sta…

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.julialang.org/t/where-is-juliac-developed/113004)._